Skip to main content

Blogging for Dollars

I've been toying with the idea of increasing how much I might get back from this little place. At times it gets down right exciting to watch my hits rise day after day, until I get writers block again and drop back to double digits for a month or so. I can't help but listen to the entrepenourial spirit in me that suggests a little more devotion and disipline on my part would push the pocket pennies to a threshold the likes of my ramen-eating self would just drool over. Hell, I could even buy two flavors of ramen.

So, I played with a few things. I naively made an attempt to jury-rig my Google Adsense snippets into my actual posts, to test what would come up in my reader. Squat, that's what. I looked around for feed-specific advertising services, and I found nothing but closed betas. I was seriously surprised at the lack of services in this area. Anyone who gets there first is going to have a serious advantage. Now, many someone is there first, so let me rephrase it as "someone who gets there first, in a noticeable way". It's enough to make a guy want a startup.

The dead-ends I've crawled back from in this pursuit must have been littered with the sweat of others out there, looking for just this sort of thing. Some places are doing in-feed advertising in-house, such as Slashdot, but the rest of us are really left hanging. Every day I look at my hits through Adsense and I really have to wonder what I'm missing. If I'm getting so many people actually making their way to my page, how many aren't even doing that much and just read it through the aggregators and never browse to the site proper?

One might suppose that the "real" hits are more important anyway. Those are the ones that really measure interest, not passive consumption. That isn't what this is about, anyway. I need some cold, hard cash.

What is everyone's opinion on the different routes? I'd like to know both what anyone thinks personally and/or what experiences you've had with the options available.
  1. What is to be done about the feeds (which are great) taking users away from our sites? Does this change the perspective of the entire web?
  2. What about our feeds being interlaced with advertising, text and banner?
  3. What reaction, if any, should the public have to paid advertising posts by bloggers and are they worth it?

Comments

metapundit.net said…
I've been watching the evolution of ads in an RSS driven world with interest. Slashdot, for instance, strips the links out of their stories now - if you're interested in a story you have to click through to slashdot in order to follow the links. I can see this in a site that's always been community based (ie - the comments are as much the deal as the news for nerds is.)

I think I actually like this model better than what they were doing previously - graphical ads embedded in the feed that sometimes dwarfed the story. Very annoying - I thought about unsubscribing for a while.

If you do pursue ads do it the google way - ads should be text based and unobtrusive. Don't ruin my reading experience! If I start seeing flash ads in my bloglines I'll unsubscribe in a heartbeat...

BTW, did you look at feedburner.com? I've never used their service but have always been under the impression that they do exactly the ads-in-feeds thing you're talking about. Maybe they're not contextual. Sure seems like the sort of thing Google would be good at, doesn't it?
Michael Foord said…
I only provide partial feeds, which means that people have to come to my site to read the full entry.

Some people argue that this actually *reduces* traffic to your site as some people won't read partial feeds.

Personally, the reason I use partial feeds is because I haven't *bothered* to put the effort into changing over... but it is an interesting debate.

I'm sure that somewhere I saw some company that would put ads into RSS feeds. Can't remember who they are though. :-)
Michael Foord said…
Feedburner offers an 'ads in RSS' service:

http://blogs.feedburner.com/feedburner/archives/001762.html

I knew I had seen it somewhere...

Popular posts from this blog

CARDIAC: The Cardboard Computer

I am just so excited about this. CARDIAC. The Cardboard Computer. How cool is that? This piece of history is amazing and better than that: it is extremely accessible. This fantastic design was built in 1969 by David Hagelbarger at Bell Labs to explain what computers were to those who would otherwise have no exposure to them. Miraculously, the CARDIAC (CARDboard Interactive Aid to Computation) was able to actually function as a slow and rudimentary computer.  One of the most fascinating aspects of this gem is that at the time of its publication the scope it was able to demonstrate was actually useful in explaining what a computer was. Could you imagine trying to explain computers today with anything close to the CARDIAC? It had 100 memory locations and only ten instructions. The memory held signed 3-digit numbers (-999 through 999) and instructions could be encoded such that the first digit was the instruction and the second two digits were the address of memory to operate on

The Range of Content on Planet Python

I've gotten a number of requests lately to contribute only Python related material to the Planet Python feeds and to be honest these requests have both surprised and insulted me, but they've continued. I am pretty sure they've come from a very small number of people, but they have become consistent. This is probably because of my current habit of writing about NaNoWriMo every day and those who aren't interested not looking forward to having the rest of the month reading about my novel. Planet Python will be getting a feed of only relevant posts in the future, but I'm going to be honest: I am kind of upset about it. I don't care if anyone thinks it is unreasonable of me to be upset about it, because the truth is Planet Python means something to me. It was probably the first thing I did that I considered "being part of the community" when I submitted my meager RSS feed to be added some seven years ago. My blog and my name on the list of authors at Plan

Pythonic Defined

Introduction Losing is Good Strings Dictionaries Conclusion Introduction Veterans and novices alike of Python will hear the term "pythonic" thrown around, and even a number of the veterans don't know what it means. There are times I do not know what it means, but that doesn't mean I can define a pretty good idea of what "pythonic" really means. Now, it has been defined at times as being whatever the BDFL decides, but we'll pull that out of the picture. I want to talk about what the word means for us today, and how it applied to what we do in the real world. Languages have their strengths and their idioms (ways of doing things), and when you exploit those you embrace the heart of that language. You can often tell when a programmer writing in one language is actually more comfortable with another, because the code they right is telltale of the other language. Java developers are notorious for writing Java in every language they get their hands on. Ho