Skip to main content

Caktus Ship It! Day 2014 Q3 Post-Mortem - Part 2: Playlists and Peers

As of my first hour playing around I was able to share and synchronize play of any MP3 between multiple users with a simple drag and drop interface. Things were going pretty well for my project, but I had some work to do getting from there to the collaborative playlist I had in mind.

I was already just assuming we were only caring about one file, because that worked well to get things up and running fast. My next step was to remove that assumption and start keeping a list of songs. This was pretty easy, in fact. I started writing a simple list of songs as they were downloaded, each with a play button which performed the <audio> tag set and play that previously done automatically. Each user could now play any song that was shared and to restore the previous synchronized playing that happened when they only dealt with a single done I incorporated broadcast changeTrack messages. I added two other broadcasts, pause and play, which would allow any users to pause and play the songs on all users simultaneously.

This was working well, and I had roughly scaled my previous prototype to a multi-song version. Unfortunately, this version was even more rough and bug-ridden than the first. Most importantly among its faults: I couldn't really predict the order different clients would receive each track, so the playlists wouldn't remain in the same order for everyone. I wasn't really ready to tackle the actual collaborative playlist problem. This is probably the most difficult problem the project will face. It is a lot harder because I'm determined to keep the entire thing peer-controlled with no central decided or coordinator.

After banging my head on the simplest way I could provide this editing for the initial version, but coming up short, I realized it was a waste of my time. I didn't really need to do collaborative editing for a prototype, I just needed to make sure they all kept the same order.

So I alphabetized the songs for all users.

The simplest solution to some problems is not to have them

At this stage I could play any song on the shared playlist and hear it on any connected machine. Things continued nicely.

Implementing playlist progression was pretty easier. Along with progression I added highlights on the list to show which song was currently being played.

I decided at this point to do a bit more seriously testing and increased my test set of songs I was drag and dropping from 3 to 8.

I crashed Chrome. How I did that and how much of this work I had to completely throw out the window? Read Part 3 (Coming Soon) to find out.

Part 1: Proof of Concept in Under an Hour

Part 2: Playlists and Reseeding Songs

Part 3: Two Steps Back and Three Steps Forward

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CARDIAC: The Cardboard Computer

I am just so excited about this. CARDIAC. The Cardboard Computer. How cool is that? This piece of history is amazing and better than that: it is extremely accessible. This fantastic design was built in 1969 by David Hagelbarger at Bell Labs to explain what computers were to those who would otherwise have no exposure to them. Miraculously, the CARDIAC (CARDboard Interactive Aid to Computation) was able to actually function as a slow and rudimentary computer.  One of the most fascinating aspects of this gem is that at the time of its publication the scope it was able to demonstrate was actually useful in explaining what a computer was. Could you imagine trying to explain computers today with anything close to the CARDIAC? It had 100 memory locations and only ten instructions. The memory held signed 3-digit numbers (-999 through 999) and instructions could be encoded such that the first digit was the instruction and the second two digits were the address of memory to operate on

The Range of Content on Planet Python

I've gotten a number of requests lately to contribute only Python related material to the Planet Python feeds and to be honest these requests have both surprised and insulted me, but they've continued. I am pretty sure they've come from a very small number of people, but they have become consistent. This is probably because of my current habit of writing about NaNoWriMo every day and those who aren't interested not looking forward to having the rest of the month reading about my novel. Planet Python will be getting a feed of only relevant posts in the future, but I'm going to be honest: I am kind of upset about it. I don't care if anyone thinks it is unreasonable of me to be upset about it, because the truth is Planet Python means something to me. It was probably the first thing I did that I considered "being part of the community" when I submitted my meager RSS feed to be added some seven years ago. My blog and my name on the list of authors at Plan

Pythonic Defined

Introduction Losing is Good Strings Dictionaries Conclusion Introduction Veterans and novices alike of Python will hear the term "pythonic" thrown around, and even a number of the veterans don't know what it means. There are times I do not know what it means, but that doesn't mean I can define a pretty good idea of what "pythonic" really means. Now, it has been defined at times as being whatever the BDFL decides, but we'll pull that out of the picture. I want to talk about what the word means for us today, and how it applied to what we do in the real world. Languages have their strengths and their idioms (ways of doing things), and when you exploit those you embrace the heart of that language. You can often tell when a programmer writing in one language is actually more comfortable with another, because the code they right is telltale of the other language. Java developers are notorious for writing Java in every language they get their hands on. Ho