Skip to main content

How to Pretend Zope Doesn't Exist

I'm doing my best to ignore that I just read Well-kept secrets of Zope, which lists all sorts of things I'm interested in seeing developed and how Zope did it. Zope is our Simpson's to South Park's Python community. All of this ORM wild fire and debates about unicode support and web frameworks seem really petty when someone reminds us that Zope, which most of us never really look at, has been doing some of these things for over a ten years. That's practically a decade in software time!

Will I settle back into a comfortable hole in the ground, cover my years, and chant "There's no such thing as Zope" or am I going to bite some pride and surround myself with Zope? The first talk for a CharPy meeting is going to be on Zope, and I'm going to ask a lot of questions about why it gets ignored and how someone really familiar with Python can get into Zope so late into the game. Now, I am not planning to drop everything else. I still think CouchDB has some interesting ideas that I'm pretty sure aren't part of ZODB. I'm also a huge Twisted fan, where it applies. We've had some segmenting problems in Python with Zope and non-Zope, Twisted and non-Twisted and, more recently, Django and non-Django. We seem to be gaining a habit of frameworks that gain a really large following and are really known to those who don't use them, who continually ignore the developments. If Zope and Twisted played together better, both in code and community, would Django ever have even surfaced to fill the gap? Would Rails have been irrelevant?

We need to build some bridges, so who wants to shake hands?

Technorati Tags: ,


Florian said…
My first python only job was maintaining a zope application for which original maintainers already hat fled the field. I tried to wrestle the thing to a zombie living where it wouldn't missbehave at the soonest opportunity, and failed miserably.

After 6 months of struggling I was at the end of my rope. I kept my job. While wrestling zope a day I started rewriting what we needed by night with the help of turbogears. Then during 2 weeks of x-mas holidays I worked like possessed, and by the first weeks of january I could present a viable exit strategy for me and the company, which would end up with me having a job and the company having an application.

I blame my predecessors (classic), but I also blame zope to no small degree, because I believe that zope lured these people, then encouraged them to be that messy and horrid, and finally made it possible for them to hang on to their jobs much longer then ought to be.

I derive a simple teaching from this story:
1) before the 3rd to 7th personal complete rewrite, any solution you write to a problem domain sucks beyond relief.
2) There is no framework substitute for being an architect for nontrivial applications. Inversly, using a framework to get near the problem domain solution feels good, but dooms your code.

So what now?

Zope bridge Twisted bridge Django and the Age of MegaGigaFrameworks? and that's going to help with either of 1) or 2)? Who're you kidding?

/me *yawns*
Anonymous said…
Florian is right, though I blame Zope's predecessor (another classic, but true). Zope 2 has this awful way of luring people into a development scheme that's just wrong and completely backwards. Fortunately, Zope 3 (which is what the Well-kept Secrets article is about) isn't at all that way. Unfortunately, it has the same name as Zope 2. Today we know that was a mistake, but can't easily change it now.

We're certainly up for some bridge-building, Calvin. Using Twisted was just one step. We now fully support WSGI, and at EuroPython I demonstrated integrating Zope with PasteDeploy, something that everybody else seems to be using nowadays.

It's good and somewhat healthy to be looking over the fence once in a while, or even be inspired by others, just like we were with Grok ( which takes the "convention over configuration" approach to Zope. That's why I think it's good for the overall community to have other frameworks with other approaches: they provides breeding grounds for new ideas. I think the diversity of Python web frameworks is a strength, not a weakness.
Florian said…
Philip, I spend quite a time contemplating what constitutes these "lures" in software.

It's a complex phenomenon, but a few things stick out. The probability of a lure rises with the complexity a piece of software. The lure probability also rises with how easy it makes it for people who know neither the problem domain nor the solution space to coax it into behaving a bit like the desired solution.

Zope3 goodness'n all, it _is_ still zope, a big mother of framework promising you to solve the most vexing of everyday web programming problems with a passing glance.

You'll forgive me if that still smells overwhelmingly like a lure to me?
Anonymous said…
Wow you are a brain surgeon. They have been doing it for 10 years? That's practically a decade. Can't put nothing past you!!!!

Popular posts from this blog

CARDIAC: The Cardboard Computer

I am just so excited about this. CARDIAC. The Cardboard Computer. How cool is that? This piece of history is amazing and better than that: it is extremely accessible. This fantastic design was built in 1969 by David Hagelbarger at Bell Labs to explain what computers were to those who would otherwise have no exposure to them. Miraculously, the CARDIAC (CARDboard Interactive Aid to Computation) was able to actually function as a slow and rudimentary computer.  One of the most fascinating aspects of this gem is that at the time of its publication the scope it was able to demonstrate was actually useful in explaining what a computer was. Could you imagine trying to explain computers today with anything close to the CARDIAC? It had 100 memory locations and only ten instructions. The memory held signed 3-digit numbers (-999 through 999) and instructions could be encoded such that the first digit was the instruction and the second two digits were the address of memory to operate on

Statement Functions

At a small suggestion in #python, I wrote up a simple module that allows the use of many python statements in places requiring statements. This post serves as the announcement and documentation. You can find the release here . The pattern is the statement's keyword appended with a single underscore, so the first, of course, is print_. The example writes 'some+text' to an IOString for a URL query string. This mostly follows what it seems the print function will be in py3k. print_("some", "text", outfile=query_iostring, sep="+", end="") An obvious second choice was to wrap if statements. They take a condition value, and expect a truth value or callback an an optional else value or callback. Values and callbacks are named if_true, cb_true, if_false, and cb_false. if_(raw_input("Continue?")=="Y", cb_true=play_game, cb_false=quit) Of course, often your else might be an error case, so raising an exception could be useful

How To Teach Software Development

How To Teach Software Development Introduction Developers Quality Control Motivation Execution Businesses Students Schools Education is broken. Education about software development is even more broken. It is a sad observation of the industry from my eyes. I come to see good developers from what should be great educations as survivors, more than anything. Do they get a headstart from their education or do they overcome it? This is the first part in a series on software education. I want to open a discussion here. Please comment if you have thoughts. Blog about it, yourself. Write about how you disagree with me. Write more if you don't. We have a troubled industry. We care enough to do something about it. We hark on the bad developers the way people used to point at freak shows, but we only hurt ourselves but not improving the situation. We have to deal with their bad code. We are the twenty percent and we can't talk to the eighty percent, by definition, so we need to impro