Skip to main content

Soft Announcement: Trapdoor Prototype

Previously I made a little preview of something I'm announcing today, but it is a soft announcement as I've had it on github for some time, but I haven't done anything with the project.

This is just a prototype, an experiment, and it is called Trapdoor. I don't remember why I named it Trapdoor.

Trapdoor has a simple concept, along the lines of Mozilla Prism. I wanted to take things I use to build web applications and test how they could be applied to building desktop applications. This meant two things:

1) I need to wrap up a web application in something that can be run locally.

2) I need some way to extend a web application in ways that normally only desktop applications can provide.

This has been done in the simplest way I could find, at the time, and is available on github.

extensions:
 - calculator.Calculator
js:
 - calculator.js
plugins:
 - trapdoor.contrib.windowmanager

Applications are configured through this simply manifest, where they are given extensions, plugins, and javascript. Honestly, extensions and plugins can probably be merged. They are both defined by a Python class and the object exposes methods to the Javascript, which gets loaded and initialized by the runtime. The current version includes two plugins:

trapdoor.contrib.windowmanager

This is a basic plugin that provides a simple createWindow method, through which the Javascript can create new windows with (in the future) more control than the standard Javascript APIs would otherwise provide. One thing I'll be adding to this is a fullscreen API and other properties to control the window appearance, such as borders and which controls are visible.

trapdoor.contrib.nodes

This is my favorite of the two standard plugins. Each Node is an isolated Javascript runtime, in its own global space. The application is loaded in the first node, but it can create and initialize others, allowing it to run untrusted Javascript safely. If I continue development, I hope to use this to test ways to allow community additions to software without worrying about what they are running. This is similar to how extensions and user scripts work in Firefox and Chrome.

Now, I don't know if more will come of this. I think, if it does, it should probably be evaluated if I should rewrite it based on Chromium and V8, rather than Qt and whatever Javascript engine it is running on. It is also lacking a solid use case, for me, that I can use to drive my desire to improve it. However, I had fun writing it for the thought experiment, and I do hope to do more with it in the near future.

Please, fork it and tell me what you think.

Comments

Rich Moore said…
Sounds similar to an app sebas and I wrote called selkie. http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Silk/Selkie for more details.

Qt uses the standard webkit js engine by default. If you build it from source you can use the v8 engine however by passing the option to the build_webkit script.

Popular posts from this blog

CARDIAC: The Cardboard Computer

I am just so excited about this. CARDIAC. The Cardboard Computer. How cool is that? This piece of history is amazing and better than that: it is extremely accessible. This fantastic design was built in 1969 by David Hagelbarger at Bell Labs to explain what computers were to those who would otherwise have no exposure to them. Miraculously, the CARDIAC (CARDboard Interactive Aid to Computation) was able to actually function as a slow and rudimentary computer.  One of the most fascinating aspects of this gem is that at the time of its publication the scope it was able to demonstrate was actually useful in explaining what a computer was. Could you imagine trying to explain computers today with anything close to the CARDIAC? It had 100 memory locations and only ten instructions. The memory held signed 3-digit numbers (-999 through 999) and instructions could be encoded such that the first digit was the instruction and the second two digits were the address of memory to operate on

The Range of Content on Planet Python

I've gotten a number of requests lately to contribute only Python related material to the Planet Python feeds and to be honest these requests have both surprised and insulted me, but they've continued. I am pretty sure they've come from a very small number of people, but they have become consistent. This is probably because of my current habit of writing about NaNoWriMo every day and those who aren't interested not looking forward to having the rest of the month reading about my novel. Planet Python will be getting a feed of only relevant posts in the future, but I'm going to be honest: I am kind of upset about it. I don't care if anyone thinks it is unreasonable of me to be upset about it, because the truth is Planet Python means something to me. It was probably the first thing I did that I considered "being part of the community" when I submitted my meager RSS feed to be added some seven years ago. My blog and my name on the list of authors at Plan

Pythonic Defined

Introduction Losing is Good Strings Dictionaries Conclusion Introduction Veterans and novices alike of Python will hear the term "pythonic" thrown around, and even a number of the veterans don't know what it means. There are times I do not know what it means, but that doesn't mean I can define a pretty good idea of what "pythonic" really means. Now, it has been defined at times as being whatever the BDFL decides, but we'll pull that out of the picture. I want to talk about what the word means for us today, and how it applied to what we do in the real world. Languages have their strengths and their idioms (ways of doing things), and when you exploit those you embrace the heart of that language. You can often tell when a programmer writing in one language is actually more comfortable with another, because the code they right is telltale of the other language. Java developers are notorious for writing Java in every language they get their hands on. Ho