Skip to main content

How To Work At SocialServe.com

Here are my instructions to anyone else who may want to work at SocialServe.com:
  1. Have a strong enough interest and passion for development to start a contracting business without any formal training. Support yourself for about a year and a half working for one client and the next.
  2. Move to an area populated enough to start a user group for your favorite development language, tool, or concept. (Mine was Python)
  3. Be suggested to send in a resume to the company of one of the first members.
  4. Sweat your way through the first real interview for the kind of job you've wanted your whole life.
  5. Cross your fingers not to screw it up.
So, that's my story. I had my interview last Tuesday, called Thursday, and started Friday. I've enjoyed it a lot. Learning my way around the codebase has been going pretty well and I've already got my first couple of commits in, as well as two small projects. I like to think I'm moving along nicely.

One of the things I need to get used to is that all of our development boxes are Macs. I have a company issued Macbook Pro (2.33ghz dual intel, 2GB RAM, 17") and I'm really enjoying the Mac life. The UNIX background is great and the interface is just slick. Installing applications is just fun. I've got the entire KDE suite installed, so I've got a lot of my favorite tools and toys right there.

The time away from the house, while somewhat nice, is probably the biggest downside. Caelan misses me a lot while I'm at work and I miss him and his mother quite a bit. After all this time at home, and all of his life so far with me there every hour, it is tough. It may be harder for me than him.

Finalizing the whole picture is my commute. 30 minutes or less to work and an hour to and hour and a half to get home. What's up with that? I need to see about leaving early or I might just leave an hour late. I'd still get home at the same time, so I might as well spend it in a comfortable chair instead of my ugly car.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CARDIAC: The Cardboard Computer

I am just so excited about this. CARDIAC. The Cardboard Computer. How cool is that? This piece of history is amazing and better than that: it is extremely accessible. This fantastic design was built in 1969 by David Hagelbarger at Bell Labs to explain what computers were to those who would otherwise have no exposure to them. Miraculously, the CARDIAC (CARDboard Interactive Aid to Computation) was able to actually function as a slow and rudimentary computer.  One of the most fascinating aspects of this gem is that at the time of its publication the scope it was able to demonstrate was actually useful in explaining what a computer was. Could you imagine trying to explain computers today with anything close to the CARDIAC? It had 100 memory locations and only ten instructions. The memory held signed 3-digit numbers (-999 through 999) and instructions could be encoded such that the first digit was the instruction and the second two digits were the address of memory to operate on

Statement Functions

At a small suggestion in #python, I wrote up a simple module that allows the use of many python statements in places requiring statements. This post serves as the announcement and documentation. You can find the release here . The pattern is the statement's keyword appended with a single underscore, so the first, of course, is print_. The example writes 'some+text' to an IOString for a URL query string. This mostly follows what it seems the print function will be in py3k. print_("some", "text", outfile=query_iostring, sep="+", end="") An obvious second choice was to wrap if statements. They take a condition value, and expect a truth value or callback an an optional else value or callback. Values and callbacks are named if_true, cb_true, if_false, and cb_false. if_(raw_input("Continue?")=="Y", cb_true=play_game, cb_false=quit) Of course, often your else might be an error case, so raising an exception could be useful

How To Teach Software Development

How To Teach Software Development Introduction Developers Quality Control Motivation Execution Businesses Students Schools Education is broken. Education about software development is even more broken. It is a sad observation of the industry from my eyes. I come to see good developers from what should be great educations as survivors, more than anything. Do they get a headstart from their education or do they overcome it? This is the first part in a series on software education. I want to open a discussion here. Please comment if you have thoughts. Blog about it, yourself. Write about how you disagree with me. Write more if you don't. We have a troubled industry. We care enough to do something about it. We hark on the bad developers the way people used to point at freak shows, but we only hurt ourselves but not improving the situation. We have to deal with their bad code. We are the twenty percent and we can't talk to the eighty percent, by definition, so we need to impro