Skip to main content

How To Influence Twisted With Django

This is probably taken as the concept for a horror novel by many, but bare with me as I am going somewhere productive with this line of thought. There are a number of valuable ideas in Django, even if they aren’t original. I think some of the concepts could be interesting if applied to Twisted. We can’t start over, but maybe we could bridge the gap.

The Project

A “Project” is a very vague concept that we all start when we’re doing something new, but in a system like Django it is a codified piece of the framework. What a project is, how it is structured, and where its boundaries lie are all documented carefully. This provides an obvious starting point and creates a wonderful sense of consistency from one project to the next.

The Application

Within a Django project one or more Django applications are combined, and each application provides a unit of reusable functionality. This might consist of DB models and views to aid in tagging objects, providing search indexes, or generating thumbnails from uploaded photos. Like the Project itself, the application is documented by Django in terms of its boundaries and structure.

If Twisted Took A Page From the Django Book?

I think we can make a case for borrowing these concepts and patterns. The running theme is breaking large things up into reusable chunks and defining the boundaries and interactions in ways that we can connect them largely via configuration. Can this work with Twisted? I think it can, in specific areas.

We can probably borrow the Project unit directly, add a script to every project that runs twistd and loads commands, like the manage.py in Django. A standard settings module to configure a project is an obvious choice.

At the next level we would configure smaller, reusable parts the project would bring together. Instead of a urls.py, we might define a ports.py, which we use to map the interfaces we listen on and the services that handle them.

I think we can’t map “Application” to any one concept, but need a variety of types of reusable things. That is fine and Django does the same. We talk about apps all the time, but we also have Request Middleware, Context Middleware, etc. Twisted has a lot of room for configurable middleware.

This is certainly something that deserves more thought.

Comments

Hey Calvin,

I can't help but love the idea of learning from other projects. Please keep thinking and writing about this topic! :)

About the specific idea of having something like `settings.py`, I have to disagree though. `settings.py` is one of my least favorite things about django projects. I don't want a pile of Python code defining a heap of global state for my project. Global state sucks! The problem settings.py is tackling is the same as the problem .tac files are tackling, I think. I think that neither one solves the problem _particularly_ well. Moving to a settings.py-like thing would just be lateral movement at best.

As far as manage.py goes, maybe you can talk about how having a copy of manage.py in every project is better than having one copy of twistd. What does manage.py get me that twistd doesn't?
Anonymous said…
I think the phrase is 'bear with me', unless you're in a naturalist beach. ;-)

Popular posts from this blog

Interrupting Coders Isn’t So Bad

Here’s a hot take: disrupting coders isn’t all that bad.

Some disruptions are certainly bad but they usually aren’t. The coder community has overblown the impact. A disruption can be a good thing. How harmful disruption might be a symptom of other problems.

There are different kinds of disruptions. They are caused by other coders on your team, managers and other non-coders, or meetings throughout the day.

The easiest example to debunk is a question from a fellow developer. Imagine someone walks over to your desk or they ping you on Slack, because they have “one quick question.” Do you get annoyed at the interruption when you were in the middle of something important? You help out your teammate quickly and get back to work, trying to pick up where you left off. That’s a kind of interruption we complain about frequently, but I’m not convinced this is all that bad.

You are being disrupted but your team, of which you are only one member of the whole unit, is working smoothly. You unstuck …

Announcing Feet, a Python Runner

I've been working on a problem that's bugged me for about as long as I've used Python and I want to announce my stab at a solution, finally!

I've been working on the problem of "How do i get this little thing I made to my friend so they can try it out?" Python is great. Python is especially a great language to get started in, when you
don't know a lot about software development, and probably don't even know a lot about computers in general.

Yes, Python has a lot of options for tackling some of these distribution problems for games and apps. Py2EXE was an early option, PyInstaller is very popular now, and PyOxide is an interesting recent entry. These can be great options, but they didn't fit the kind of use case and experience that made sense to me. I'd never really been about to put my finger on it, until earlier this year:

Python needs LÖVE.

LÖVE, also known as "Love 2D", is a game engine that makes it super easy to build small Lua…

CARDIAC: The Cardboard Computer

I am just so excited about this.


CARDIAC. The Cardboard Computer. How cool is that? This piece of history is amazing and better than that: it is extremely accessible. This fantastic design was built in 1969 by David Hagelbarger at Bell Labs to explain what computers were to those who would otherwise have no exposure to them. Miraculously, the CARDIAC (CARDboard Interactive Aid to Computation) was able to actually function as a slow and rudimentary computer. 
One of the most fascinating aspects of this gem is that at the time of its publication the scope it was able to demonstrate was actually useful in explaining what a computer was. Could you imagine trying to explain computers today with anything close to the CARDIAC?

It had 100 memory locations and only ten instructions. The memory held signed 3-digit numbers (-999 through 999) and instructions could be encoded such that the first digit was the instruction and the second two digits were the address of memory to operate on. The only re…