Skip to main content

Paper Rock Scissors: Day 2

Yesterday I wrote about the little tech-demo Paper Rock Scissors game I prototyped in the morning. Today, I've replaced its crude AJAX polling with a comet solution, cleaned up the UI, and added a real-time chat for the players, in about two hours this afternoon.
You can try it out with the other readers of the blog right now. Give it a try, if anyone else is around.




Very simple. Nothing flashy. The point was to show off how comet can improve a project that needs it.

The prototype yesterday had a 500ms interval updating the game state, so twice a second it would ask the server if the score changed, if the other player made a move yet, etc. This is a terrible way to make multi-user interactions! The server would quickly get bogged down by all that polling and anything other than Paper Rock Scissors would take a lot more fine-grained polling than 500ms, increasing the load a lot. The solution, in HTTP land, is that we replace several polls per second with a single poll that waits for as long as it can, and only returns a response to the browser when the server wants to send a message. In some techniques, we can even stream multiple such messages in one very long connection. Brilliant? It is actually a very old technique, as far as the web is concerned. One interesting thing is I had used this a lot many years ago, in my Twisted days, where it had been implemented as part of Nevow many years ago. I'm glad to see it finally catching on.

This implementation uses Node.js and the Faye implementation of the Bayeux protocol, an open spec about how multiple machines can pass messages around via comet techniques. Faye doesn't implement all of this, but it implements enough. This is a subscribe-publish system, so what I've done is dropped the interval and instead, whenever either player does something, they publish a message on a per-match channel they both subscribe to. This is also used to carry chat messages. The clients both subscribe to the channel, and publish this tick when something happens, signaling the other player to update from the server. It is still pretty simple, but it works pretty well for being simple. The message handling is as easy as this:

faye_client.subscribe("/prs/matches/" + match_id, function(message) {
  if (message.chat) {
    chat.add_message(message.chat)
  }
  game_update();
});


$(".weapon").click(function() {
  faye_client.publish("/prs/matches/" + match_id, {heartbeat: true});
}

Easy, isn't it? Faye pushes every message published to all the subscribers of the channel for us. The actual game server isn't even involved in this part (but it could be).

Setup of Faye is as easy as fetching Node.js and Faye sources, and building them quickly. Both are new enough that you won't find them in apt or yum, but they are so simple that I can include a tutorial right here.

The original instructions are at the nodejs.org website, but can be summarized easily.

git clone http://github.com/ry/node.git
cd node
./configure
make
sudo make install

Bam. Done. Easy? Move on to installing Faye.

git clone http://github.com/jcoglan/faye.git
cd faye
sudo gem install jake hoe eventmachine
sudo gem install em-http-request rack thin json
jake

Now you've got the node.js module in faye/build/ which you can put anywhere.

sudo mkdir -p /usr/local/nodejs/modules/
cp build/faye-node.js /usr/local/nodejs/modules/faye.js
export NODE_PATH=$NODE_PATH:/usr/local/nodejs/modules/

And now all that is left is to build a Node.js server using Faye, with a simple file faye_server.js


var Faye   = require('faye'),
    server = new Faye.NodeAdapter({mount: '/'});


server.listen(8000);

That was the easiest one yet.

Check out Faye and Node.js for more information.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On Pruning Your Passions

We live in a hobby-rich world. There is no shortage of pastimes to grow a passion for. There is a shortage of one thing: time to indulge those passions. If you're someone who pours your heart into that one thing that makes your life worthwhile, that's a great deal. But, what if you've got no shortage of interests that draw your attention and you realize you will never have the time for all of them?

If I look at all the things I'd love to do with my life as a rose bush I'm tending, I realize that careful pruning is essential for the best outcome. This is a hard lesson to learn, because it can mean cutting beautiful flowers and watching the petals fall to the ground to wither. It has to be done.

I have a full time job that takes a lot of my mental energy. I have a wife and a son and family time is very important in my house. I try to read more, and I want to keep up with new developments in my career, and I'm trying to make time for simple, intentional relaxing t…

The Insidiousness of The Slow Solution

In software development, slow solutions can be worse than no progress at all. I'll even say its usually worse and if you find yourself making slow progress on a problem, consider stopping while you're a head.

Its easy to see why fast progress is better: either you solve the problem or you prove a proposed solution wrong and find a better one. Even a total standstill in pushing forward on a task or a bug or a request can force you to seek out new information or a second opinion.

Slow solutions, on the other hand, is kind of sneaky. Its insidious. Slow solution is related the Sunk Cost Fallacy, but maybe worse. Slow solutions have you constantly dripping more of your time, energy, and hope into a path that's still unproven, constantly digging a hole. Slow solutions are deceptive, because they still do offer real progress. It is hard to justify abandoning it or trying another route, because it is "working", technically.

We tend to romanticize the late night hacking…

Why I Switched From Git to Microsoft OneDrive

I made the unexpected move with a string of recent projects to drop Git to sync between my different computers in favor of OneDrive, the file sync offering from Microsoft. Its like Dropbox, but "enterprise."

Feeling a little ashamed at what I previously would have scoffed at should I hear of it from another developer, I felt a little write up of the why and the experience could be a good idea. Now, I should emphasize that I'm not dropping Git for all my projects, just specific kinds of projects. I've been making this change in habit for projects that are just for me, not shared with anyone else. It has been especially helpful in projects I work on sporadically. More on why a little later.

So, what drove me away from Git, exactly?

On the smallest projects, like game jam hacks, I just wanted to code. I didn't want to think about revisions and commit messages. I didn't need branching or merges. I didn't even need to rollback to another version, ever. I just …