Skip to main content

Ways Django Can Import Things

How many ways can django import a module?

Grep is hard for this.

In .py files

"import (.*)\..*"
"from (.*)\..* import .*"
"patterns\(['"](.*)['"]"
"url(r?['"].*, ['"](.*)"


In INSTALLED_APPS and other settings.

Am I missing any? Better question: Why do I have to wonder if I'm missing any?

Comments

Doug Napoleone said…
You forgot about the magic __path__ hack done to the templatetags 'package' directory. It turns out that app.templatetags.app and django.templtatetags.app are two DIFFERENT imports of the same code and are independent modules with their own globals and locals...

Think about that for a while...
James Bennett said…
You did actually miss one: django.utils.importlib, which is simply a copy of the available-in-future-Python importlib module that Brett Cannon helpfully backported for us to handle all the things in Django (think pluggable backend modules) which require dynamic imports. Previously we used Python's raw __import__ for that, and importlib makes it ever so much simpler, and generally they have to in order to support the sort of dynamic-but-still-concise stuff people like to do in Python.

Anyway, two of the things you've listed are just standard Python import statements, and the other two are just URL-pattern functions which -- if it bugs you that much -- will happily accept the actual callable (or an iterable of patterns, in the case of include()) instead of strings. The string option is mostly just a convenience.

So I'm not sure I really understand the "why do I have to wonder if I'm missing any"; lots of frameworks/libraries have ways to specify something as a string and get it dynamically imported later through some mechanism other than a direct "import whatever" statement.

Oh, and for Doug: the __path__ hacking for templatetags is finally gone in trunk, which means it won't be in 1.2. The last bit of "magic" from magic-removal is finally out, hallelujah.
Not sure if it is what you were intent on capturing, but there is the import of the Django settings file as a special sort of case. I recently posted some stuff about that at http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2010/03/improved-wsgi-script-for-use-with.html.
James said…
__import__( ... )
Robert said…
Wouldn't it be nice to standardize these 'import later module strings'* that various python frameworks have as some sort of generic-ized deferredimport('some.python.path.etc') object?

*: which are sometimes necessary due to definition order and cyclic dependencies etc.

Popular posts from this blog

Respect and Code Reviews

Code Reviews in a development team only function best, or possible at all, when everyone approaches them with respect. That’s something I’ve usually taken for granted because I’ve had the opportunity to work with amazing developers who shine not just in their technical skills but in their interpersonal skills on a team. That isn’t always the case, so I’m going to put into words something that often exists just in assumptions.
You have to respect your code. This is first only because the nature and intent of code reviews are to safeguard the quality of your code, so even having code reviews demonstrates a baseline of respect for that code. But, maybe not everyone on the team has the same level of respect or entered a team with existing review traditions that they aren’t acquainted with.
There can be culture shock when you enter a team that’s really heavy on code reviews, but also if you enter a team or interact with a colleague who doesn’t share that level of respect for the process or…

CARDIAC: The Cardboard Computer

I am just so excited about this.


CARDIAC. The Cardboard Computer. How cool is that? This piece of history is amazing and better than that: it is extremely accessible. This fantastic design was built in 1969 by David Hagelbarger at Bell Labs to explain what computers were to those who would otherwise have no exposure to them. Miraculously, the CARDIAC (CARDboard Interactive Aid to Computation) was able to actually function as a slow and rudimentary computer. 
One of the most fascinating aspects of this gem is that at the time of its publication the scope it was able to demonstrate was actually useful in explaining what a computer was. Could you imagine trying to explain computers today with anything close to the CARDIAC?

It had 100 memory locations and only ten instructions. The memory held signed 3-digit numbers (-999 through 999) and instructions could be encoded such that the first digit was the instruction and the second two digits were the address of memory to operate on. The only re…

How To Care If BSD, MIT, or GPL Licenses Are Used

The two recent posts about some individuals' choice of GPL versus others' preference for BSD and MIT style licensing has caused a lot of debate and response. I've seen everything as an interesting combination of very important topics being taken far too seriously and far too personally. All involved need to take a few steps back.

For the uninitiated and as a clarifier for the initiated, we're dealing with (basically) three categories of licensing when someone releases software (and/or its code):
Closed Source. Easiest to explain, because you just get nothing.GPL. If you get the software, you get the source code, you get to change it, and anything you combine it with must be under the same terms.MIT and BSD. If you get the software, you might get the source code, you get to change it, and you have no obligations about anything else you combine it with.The situation gets stickier when we look at those combinations and the transitions between them.

Use GPL code with Closed S…