Skip to main content

Ways Django Can Import Things

How many ways can django import a module?

Grep is hard for this.

In .py files

"import (.*)\..*"
"from (.*)\..* import .*"
"patterns\(['"](.*)['"]"
"url(r?['"].*, ['"](.*)"


In INSTALLED_APPS and other settings.

Am I missing any? Better question: Why do I have to wonder if I'm missing any?

Comments

Doug Napoleone said…
You forgot about the magic __path__ hack done to the templatetags 'package' directory. It turns out that app.templatetags.app and django.templtatetags.app are two DIFFERENT imports of the same code and are independent modules with their own globals and locals...

Think about that for a while...
James Bennett said…
You did actually miss one: django.utils.importlib, which is simply a copy of the available-in-future-Python importlib module that Brett Cannon helpfully backported for us to handle all the things in Django (think pluggable backend modules) which require dynamic imports. Previously we used Python's raw __import__ for that, and importlib makes it ever so much simpler, and generally they have to in order to support the sort of dynamic-but-still-concise stuff people like to do in Python.

Anyway, two of the things you've listed are just standard Python import statements, and the other two are just URL-pattern functions which -- if it bugs you that much -- will happily accept the actual callable (or an iterable of patterns, in the case of include()) instead of strings. The string option is mostly just a convenience.

So I'm not sure I really understand the "why do I have to wonder if I'm missing any"; lots of frameworks/libraries have ways to specify something as a string and get it dynamically imported later through some mechanism other than a direct "import whatever" statement.

Oh, and for Doug: the __path__ hacking for templatetags is finally gone in trunk, which means it won't be in 1.2. The last bit of "magic" from magic-removal is finally out, hallelujah.
Not sure if it is what you were intent on capturing, but there is the import of the Django settings file as a special sort of case. I recently posted some stuff about that at http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2010/03/improved-wsgi-script-for-use-with.html.
James said…
__import__( ... )
Robert said…
Wouldn't it be nice to standardize these 'import later module strings'* that various python frameworks have as some sort of generic-ized deferredimport('some.python.path.etc') object?

*: which are sometimes necessary due to definition order and cyclic dependencies etc.

Popular posts from this blog

Interrupting Coders Isn’t So Bad

Here’s a hot take: disrupting coders isn’t all that bad.

Some disruptions are certainly bad but they usually aren’t. The coder community has overblown the impact. A disruption can be a good thing. How harmful disruption might be a symptom of other problems.

There are different kinds of disruptions. They are caused by other coders on your team, managers and other non-coders, or meetings throughout the day.

The easiest example to debunk is a question from a fellow developer. Imagine someone walks over to your desk or they ping you on Slack, because they have “one quick question.” Do you get annoyed at the interruption when you were in the middle of something important? You help out your teammate quickly and get back to work, trying to pick up where you left off. That’s a kind of interruption we complain about frequently, but I’m not convinced this is all that bad.

You are being disrupted but your team, of which you are only one member of the whole unit, is working smoothly. You unstuck …

CARDIAC: The Cardboard Computer

I am just so excited about this.


CARDIAC. The Cardboard Computer. How cool is that? This piece of history is amazing and better than that: it is extremely accessible. This fantastic design was built in 1969 by David Hagelbarger at Bell Labs to explain what computers were to those who would otherwise have no exposure to them. Miraculously, the CARDIAC (CARDboard Interactive Aid to Computation) was able to actually function as a slow and rudimentary computer. 
One of the most fascinating aspects of this gem is that at the time of its publication the scope it was able to demonstrate was actually useful in explaining what a computer was. Could you imagine trying to explain computers today with anything close to the CARDIAC?

It had 100 memory locations and only ten instructions. The memory held signed 3-digit numbers (-999 through 999) and instructions could be encoded such that the first digit was the instruction and the second two digits were the address of memory to operate on. The only re…

How To Care If BSD, MIT, or GPL Licenses Are Used

The two recent posts about some individuals' choice of GPL versus others' preference for BSD and MIT style licensing has caused a lot of debate and response. I've seen everything as an interesting combination of very important topics being taken far too seriously and far too personally. All involved need to take a few steps back.

For the uninitiated and as a clarifier for the initiated, we're dealing with (basically) three categories of licensing when someone releases software (and/or its code):
Closed Source. Easiest to explain, because you just get nothing.GPL. If you get the software, you get the source code, you get to change it, and anything you combine it with must be under the same terms.MIT and BSD. If you get the software, you might get the source code, you get to change it, and you have no obligations about anything else you combine it with.The situation gets stickier when we look at those combinations and the transitions between them.

Use GPL code with Closed S…