Skip to main content

How To Track Changes in the Location Hash

As the web becomes more "2.0" we're collapsing collections of pages into fewer and even single, more dynamic pages. Instead of ten pages of event listings, we might have page that loads further items dynamically as you scroll. The state that was once static to a page is now loose and can alter in the lifetime of a page, which grows longer every day. Parameters of the page state have always sat in either the path, in URLs like http://myblog.us/post/how-are-you or the querystring in cases like http://www.coolstore.com/view.html?product=4356.

Neither approach works when those parameters are changing for the life of the page, and where a single URL needs to be able to represent these multiple parameter values at any time. In most uses so far, the bullet is simply bitten. The user can browse to your site and click around, and if they bookmark or send the link to a friend, they'll always come back to the front page, because the state of the page is no longer held in that URL. This wasn't acceptable for long and a few projects, including GMail, have taken to tossing some state information into the hash or anchor of the URL, after the # symbol. This has traditionally told a browser to scroll to a <a> tag with that name, but if none exists it becomes, essentially, a no-op. We have a place in URL we can stare state, now, without causing page loads and persisting the state in links and bookmarks. There still haven't been great or standard ways to deal with this, yet.

A couple years ago I started my own attempt to make this easier, when I found existing libraries outdated or just not really doing what I hoped for. They either seemed to depend on obsolete versions of other libraries, or only give a little trigger when the hash changed. I thought we needed something more than that, because this is really replacing everything we used to use querystrings for. Sure, I could toss #2 or #43 at the end of the URL depending on what page of results you saw, but what if the state was more than a single number? Querystrings can store lots of variables. This is what I wanted within the hash.

Born was hashtrack.js!

The API is pretty simple. You can check and set variables in the hash with hashtrack.getVar() and hashtrack.setVar(). Changes to the hash or to specific variables in it can be registered with callbacks via hashtrack.onhashchange() and hashtrack.onhashvarchange(). You can view the full documentation, included embedded interactive examples, at the github pages hosting it.

Comments

schmichael said…
Thanks for the code! I've been using jQuery's History plugin, but it doesn't offer per-variable callbacks (and it seems to be unmaintained).

I removed the jQuery.each dependency in a fork on GitHub. I also fixed up the whitespace and tried to make jslint happy, but you can ignore those changesets if you want. :-)

@schmichael

Popular posts from this blog

On Pruning Your Passions

We live in a hobby-rich world. There is no shortage of pastimes to grow a passion for. There is a shortage of one thing: time to indulge those passions. If you're someone who pours your heart into that one thing that makes your life worthwhile, that's a great deal. But, what if you've got no shortage of interests that draw your attention and you realize you will never have the time for all of them?

If I look at all the things I'd love to do with my life as a rose bush I'm tending, I realize that careful pruning is essential for the best outcome. This is a hard lesson to learn, because it can mean cutting beautiful flowers and watching the petals fall to the ground to wither. It has to be done.

I have a full time job that takes a lot of my mental energy. I have a wife and a son and family time is very important in my house. I try to read more, and I want to keep up with new developments in my career, and I'm trying to make time for simple, intentional relaxing t…

The Insidiousness of The Slow Solution

In software development, slow solutions can be worse than no progress at all. I'll even say its usually worse and if you find yourself making slow progress on a problem, consider stopping while you're a head.

Its easy to see why fast progress is better: either you solve the problem or you prove a proposed solution wrong and find a better one. Even a total standstill in pushing forward on a task or a bug or a request can force you to seek out new information or a second opinion.

Slow solutions, on the other hand, is kind of sneaky. Its insidious. Slow solution is related the Sunk Cost Fallacy, but maybe worse. Slow solutions have you constantly dripping more of your time, energy, and hope into a path that's still unproven, constantly digging a hole. Slow solutions are deceptive, because they still do offer real progress. It is hard to justify abandoning it or trying another route, because it is "working", technically.

We tend to romanticize the late night hacking…

Why I Switched From Git to Microsoft OneDrive

I made the unexpected move with a string of recent projects to drop Git to sync between my different computers in favor of OneDrive, the file sync offering from Microsoft. Its like Dropbox, but "enterprise."

Feeling a little ashamed at what I previously would have scoffed at should I hear of it from another developer, I felt a little write up of the why and the experience could be a good idea. Now, I should emphasize that I'm not dropping Git for all my projects, just specific kinds of projects. I've been making this change in habit for projects that are just for me, not shared with anyone else. It has been especially helpful in projects I work on sporadically. More on why a little later.

So, what drove me away from Git, exactly?

On the smallest projects, like game jam hacks, I just wanted to code. I didn't want to think about revisions and commit messages. I didn't need branching or merges. I didn't even need to rollback to another version, ever. I just …